Skip to content

Back to Our Blog

Empire Center: Single Payer “Sticker Shock”

Blog Categories

March 17, 2022

A new report from the Empire Center for Public Policy details how expensive a single payer healthcare system would be in New York. The full report is available here.

The report notes that the New York Health Act (NYHA) would radically reform New York’s tax structure. The bill calls for a “progressively graduated” tax on both income and payroll; however, the exact rates are not specified in the legislation. This is, in part, because the bill sponsors are also unaware of how much revenue the state would need to finance a single payer healthcare system. However, the latest estimate by the RAND Corporation is that New York would need an additional $157 billion in revenue to operate a single payer system. By removing cost controls, this number could grow.

Raising this revenue would require the largest tax increase in history. The report estimated that, to raise the needed revenue, the top tax rate would increase to 36% — which would be three times the top rate in California, the state with the second highest tax rate. New York would become an extreme outlier in taxes.

NYHA advocates claim that while taxes would increase under the NYHA, premiums would lower, leading to a net savings for many New Yorkers. The RAND Corporation estimates that such a tax structure would mean 65% of New Yorkers end up saving money, 4% pay about the same, and 31% see additional costs. Although this may appear more progressive initially, the report notes that NYHA would add significant incentives for outmigration, especially among top earners and high-producing businesses. Losing top taxpayers would shift more of the cost burden onto middle and lower income families, eliminating the bill’s intended benefit.

In years where healthcare costs increase or state revenues decrease, taxpayers would face significant pressure and additional tax hikes to keep the NYHA system solvent.

Lastly, the report notes that the NYHA would cause concern for doctors and medical providers, who would experience income changes that may repel them from New York.

The report details the concerns that the BNP and employers have raised since the NYHA was introduced three decades ago. The NYHA would dramatically increase taxes for many businesses and families, create incentives for outmigration, and discourage medical professionals from practicing in our state.

Read the full report hereand take action on this issue here. 

Related Posts

Senate to Consider Innovation & Competition Act

By growthzone | May 19, 2021

The U.S. Senate has begun formal consideration of the U.S. Innovation & Competition Act (S. 1260), previously known as the Endless Frontier Act. This bipartisan legislation, sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, recently passed the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and a floor vote is expected by the end of May.

5.17.21 COVID-19 Bulletin: Cuomo Lifts Mask Mandate for Vaccinated New Yorkers

By growthzone | May 17, 2021

Starting this Wednesday, May 19, 2021, fully vaccinated New Yorkers no longer need to wear a mask or face covering outdoors and in most indoor settings.

UU Analysis: NYHA Will Add Costs, Eliminate Jobs

By growthzone | May 15, 2021

Upstate United, a BNP partner organization and non-partisan, pro-taxpayer, pro-economic growth, and pro-Upstate education advocacy coalition, recently analyzed the research on the potential economic impact of the New York Health Act (NYHA).

5.7.21 BNP Advocacy Alert – Extended Producer Responsibility Act Too Costly for New York

By growthzone | May 7, 2021

For weeks, the Buffalo Niagara Partnership has sounded the alarm on S. 1185, known as the Extended Producer Responsibility Act. This bill would broadly shift the responsibility of recycling packaging material (carton, glass, metal), paper and plastic products from municipalities to businesses, which the BNP suspected would add exorbitant costs onto businesses and consumers.